The TOEFL writing section includes 2 separate tasks – an integrated task, which requires you to respond to a lecture or passage, and an independent task, which asks you to use personal experience to explain your opinions on a topic. Read on for helpful tips and strategies, practice topics and essays, and more!
toefl itp,toefl,toefl ibt,toefl ibt listening test,toefl itp listening,toefl primary,toefl junior,toefl listening practice test,toefl writing,toefl writing question 1,toefl writing question 2,toefl writing sample,toefl writing topics,toefl writing practice
Jeff and Elle says
This is helpful. Please upload more! Thank you
Helbert Valério says
Task 1
Based on the passage, the privatization of spaceflight industry will be positive for science and society,encourageing competition, discoveries and cutting taxs. By contrast, the lecture explains that commercial spaceflights may be prejudicial for industry, keeping high costs, destroying public searchs and requireing expensive sctructures.
First, the author of the passage suggests that spacial travels will be cheaper with the privatization, because the competition will help to provide lower prices and more efficients products. On the other hand, the lecturer claims that the process for securance tests and the operate sistems will remain a high cost, making the cheaping minimum. Clearly, the author and the lecturer maintain different views on the possibility of commercial spaceflights contribute for the industry.
Second, the passage argues that the privatization of spacial technology benefits scientific searchs, bulding more laboratories and employing more scientists, acelerateing discoveries. This concept is refuted by the passage, which asserts that private companies, offering better salaries, are going to catch government scientists, attacking the public operation.What this differences means is that the author sees the opening for private area as benefitial, while the lecturer thinks it’s danger for public development.
Finally, the author writes that the send of costs from government to companies makes the taxpaying eased, reduceing spents for society. On the contrary, the lecturer tells that commercial spaceflights demands a lot of taxs for structures, built by public agencies, compensating the cost reduction. I conclusion, the author and the lecturer appear to be in disagreement about the results from the privatization of spaceflight industry
Büşra Şimşek says
Integrated Writing
The article and the lecture both deals with privatization of the spaceflight industry. While the author of the reading asserts that making the spaceflight industry privatized would contribute to society and the World of science for three specific reasons, the lecturer disputes author’s claims. In his opinion / His position is that the privatization approach would not be such a beneficial for both entities.
Firstly, the author suggests that with the advent of the privatization wave on the shore, space travel will be cheaper due to the fact that privatization spurs competition in the industry which in turn leads to a decrease in the price of the tickets.
In contrast, the lecturer posits that privatization would not have a price-decreasing effect because privatization of the spaceflight industry requires not only a control system that controls flights of spacecraft in order to curb collusion of the spacecrafts but also safety measures to save travelers’ life which increase cost of the space, travel thereby making flights expensive.
Secondly, the author points out that privatization would be conducive to developing new technologies because private funds would be transferred to the industry which enables the scientist to research in the aerospace industry.
However, the lecturer rebuts this claim by saying that the fact that privatization leads to an increase in the wage of scientists in this sector, the best scientist will not prefer to work in public research. Consequently, it has a detrimental effect on research.
Finally, it is indicated in the article that thanks to privatization, some part of the cost of space travel will be defrayed by private firms which in turn reduces the burden on taxpayers. As opposed to the author, the lecturer holds that the expense of space travel is so high that private funding can not cover all of them. Therefore, the government will be obliged to subsidize the price of space travel. Consequently, the financial burden on the citizens might not be mitigated enough as expected.
sarthak patnaik says
Task1:
The passage states that spacecraft developed by private individual companies would provide the opportunity to private individuals to buy their own tickets to travel into space, which will bring great benefits to both science and public. The audio however argues against this argument by stating few points in order to prove that there would be no such benefits for neither private individuals nor science.
The passage states that due to extreme competition the cost of space travel services offered by private commercial spacecrafts would be extremely low. The audio however disagrees with this proposition. It states that the cost of space travel via private spacecraft would be rather expensive due to the management of space traffic, also space flights need to be tested and retested to ensure proper safety measures are taken, which would be part of safety costs. Since the space travel venture is not undertaken by the government the prices of space travel for private individuals would be extremely expensive.
The passage also mentions how space travel will accelerate the rate at which important scientific discoveries occur, due to the growth of the industry with aerospace and private commercial spaceship industry. The audio disagrees and points out that privatization would only delay scientific progress. The reason for this is that individuals working for government controlled spacecraft services would start working for private commercial services which would pay them higher. But the commercial work which they would be carrying out in these companies would have no scientific value.
Finally, the passage argues that when government are sole providers of space travel, the public is responsible for paying tax. However in case of private space travel services taxes would be paid by customers via funds raised by private spacecraft operators, thereby reducing the burden on taxpayers. The audio however mentions that due to the presence of huge public tax subsidies the taxpayers won’t be able to get off the hook and more tax would be paid by the taxpayers.
Task 2:
One cannot deny the fact that education is one of the basic facilities which should be available to everyone in the country. When most of the people in a country are rightly educated, the progress made by that country would be exponential. However, providing college education free to one and all is quiet impossible with the reality that one experiences in the outside world.
Firstly, one has to realize that in each and every society there exists class difference among people. Wealth is highly concentrated in a few hands which makes the society extremely uneven. Certain people have the money to afford good quality education while others simply cannot. Therefore, it is important for the ruling government to make sure that the money which has to be paid by individuals for college education shouldn’t be a one for all. It should keep in the mind these class differences which are part of society.
Secondly, it is important to provide education to individuals, but what is more important is to make sure that the students that go through a particular curriculum in college are coming out with the required skills to compete and stand toe to toe with other students in a global platform. To ensure this, it is important for colleges to invest in the latest technology as per the market in every department. The college cannot do it simply with the government funding. The money which would be paid by individuals to colleges will allow these colleges to use that money to invest in the best educational facilities out there in the market.
Finally, it is human nature that we value the things for which we have to take out some of that cash out of our pockets. There have been multiple psychological studies which confirmed the deep relationship between investing wealth in something and taking responsibility towards that. If a product of high quality is provided for free, the product often loses its value. Same is the case with education. One should learn to put his or her money where his or her mouth is and that will teach students to take responsibilities for their careers, specially the rich ones.
In conclusion, I disagree with the proposition that college education should be free to everyone. There are numerous factors existing within society which cast severe doubt on this proposition and spending money on education will only benefit both entities, the college would be able to bring in the latest technology to enhance educational facilities and students would learn to take responsibility for their careers.
Aussie sísí says
Education is no doubt a means to a comfortable livelihood. It encourages active communication, creates equality and promotes self-confidence. While education promotes various beneficial experiences to members of society, not everyone values a college degree. To this, I believe that college admission should be open to people who can afford the related expenses. I have two reasons.
First, free college allows access to the general public. This open access creates the problem of overcrowding to be able to accommodate the influx of students. The ability to learn and listen attentively is hampered due to a large number of undergraduates, hence leading to poor academic performance. Furthermore, it burdens the workload on the lecturer and reduces the teaching requirements in order to cope with assessments. For instance, a teacher with a class of 660 students may result in computer-based multiple choice questions rather than the regular handwritten essay examination.
Second, free colleges may increase the rate of unemployment. To begin with due to the large intake of undergraduates, after four years it is expected that the same number of students graduate successfully. After graduation, there will be more graduate to job ratio which will negatively impact on the labor-hire market. For example, graduates of environmental engineering will focus job hunting in the environmental engineering industry while graduate nurses drift toward the medical industry. These industries offer fewer employment opportunities which end up creating unemployed graduates.
To sum up, college education should be limited to people who can afford them or have a passion for the respective field of study. This will help reduce unemployment in specialized fields, increase learning performance and if opportunity presents, start a practice that employs other graduates. As it is said, a man puts his mouth where his money is, meaning there is value in what is paid for.
Aussie sísí says
The professor discusses the privatization of space crafts and why it is not beneficial for research and tourism. The information he presents is in direct contrast to the facts outlined in the reading passage.
First, the lecturer mentions that privatizing space crafts will increase the cost of space exploration because of the cost needed in developing infrastructures. He cites the examples of building space control towers and conducting safety check as possible parameters that are likely to increase the price of space travel tickets. On the other hand, according to the reading, private ownership of space travel will decrease the technical cost related to space visits and make it possible for tourism and education purposes.
Second, the speaker mentions that private spacecraft possession will decrease the rate of scientific exploration . in particular he describes how professionals will migrate to private companies from government firms because of higher wages and lead to the publishing or research on the topic with no research importance. However, the reading specifies that private space crat ownership provides the opportunity to recruit more researchers and hence lead to faster scientific discoveries.
Finally, the professor points out that the private spacecraft industry will mount the associated cost on taxpayer to increase the amount of tax per capita. He explains how private industry is not able to generate funds needed without government assistance. In contrast, the reading makes it clear that related cost will be provided by the private investor with no burden on the government or its taxpayers.
Mr. Abdelhadi Abdelal says
In this set of materials, both of the reading and listening are discussing the privatization of the space flights. While the reading state that these flights will be cheaper in the future, the lecture refutes this saying it will stay expensive.
First of all, the reading claims that the privatization will make the space flights cheaper because of the competition with the other companies so this will benefit the tourist and the scientists. However, the lecture argues this saying it will stay the trips will stay expensive because the safety and the test cost a lot. Furthermore, the professor states that it will not be cheaper for the current times.
In addition, the reading makes the argument that private trips will make the discoveries faster which will increase the number of working scientists in the future.The lecture counters this saying that it will prevent the discoveries because the commercial trips will get a lot of money which will make scientists to change themselves form the work on discoveries to work on the commercial stuff to earn more money.
Finally, the reading says when the government is the only provider for the space travel the taxpaying will be on the public and the expenses will be by the customers. The lecture refuses this saying that there will be a huge tax on these trips because it needs a lot of development and tools. Moreover, the professor says that it needs a lot of money and taxes to be good for people and tourists.
rate this please guys 🙂
Jes Berperi says
Could you please correct my essay. Thanks a million.
Receiving a good education is important to improve people knowledge and improve the probabilities of having a better life. Although many people disagree that education should be free for everyone, I totally disagree with this and I think that college should be free for everyone. College not only does improve education but also provides a better social progression in the society. In addition to this, it will allow people to go to the college regardless of their economic background.
First, college education is the best education that a person can receive. At the university students have to memorise great quantity of information in short time, besides they have to learn how to use this information in order to resolve the problems presented by the professors. Therefore, students learn a set of skills that will be useful later on in life in a variety of situations, such us how to design a house or how to resolve a mechanic engine failure.
Second, school education help people progress in life. There are several professions that requiered that qualified people, and the only way to qualified is through university. As result when people assist to school they will be able to work like engineering or medical doctor, among others. In general all qualified profession are well paid and have social recognition. That is why going to university improves people statuts in society.
Third, free college will allow everyone to assist to universityy. At the oment many students are not able to go to the university because, it is really expensive, nevertheless, if studies were paid by the goverment, all students would be ble to assist. As college workers earn more money, goverment will recover the cost with higher income tax.
To sum up, from my personal view college should be free since it is the best way to improve people knowledge, also it will help to improve the quality of life of people by facilitating social progression. Furthermore, it will allow everyone go to the university, not only the ones who can afford it.
The reading passage states that private space tourism will benefit both the science and the public, and prvides three reasons of support. Notwithstanding, the lecturer does not agree with this, and rejects each of the author’s reasons.
First, the passage avers that private space travel will make space travel cheaper since the privatization will bring costs down. On the other hand, the speaker denies this claim by suggesting that private space travel not only will requiere the creation of an air traffic controller for space but also the cost of safety measures will be really high.
Second, the author posits that the privatization of space travel will facilitate the scientist research in the aerospace industry. Nevertheless, the lecturer casts doubt about this affirmation by claiming that the best scientists will abandon public research in favor of private organisations that pay higher salaries, and as a result serios research will suffer negatively.
Third, the reading passage avers that the cost of space travel will be paid by private companies and not by governments. However, the speakers counters this affirmation by pointing out that with only private funding it is not possible to pay the tickets for travel to the space, consequently, governments will have to subsidize the prices of space travels.
Magdalena Alabí says
This were my answers
TOEFL- INTEGRATED WRITING TEST
SPACE TOURISM INDUSTRY
Both the reading and the lecture discuss the space tourism industry. While the article is more optimistic about this emerging industry, the listening passage does not. In fact, the professor in the lecture challenges each point made in the reading passage.
The first point given in the article as a possible benefit from the space tourism industry is that private space travel will reduce the final costs of the tickets as the development of this industry imply more competition both in tourism and science areas. Therefore, technological costs will decrease and this will make more accessible to more people space flights. The lecture challenges this point by saying that this will not necessarily happen, as there are some costs that are not taking on account. Firstly, a control system needs to developed and what is a really expensive thing to do, but also the safety process is another cost that has to be included in the whole price. For all of this, the professor does not think this is going to make the prices lower.
Other point made in the article is that the space tourism industry will enable to accelerate the discovering made by the scientists by explaining that there will be more scientist in the industry, therefore there will be more work. On the contrary, the professor says that indeed this will produce delays on discovering, as the tourism industry will take scientists to their field making it really hard to the science area to develop more studies and results.
Finally, while the reading passage stays that the financial burden on taxpayers will be eased significantly the lecture says that it will not be possible for private investors to pay all the taxes by themselves, so taxpayers will have to continue on participating of this burden.
TOEFL- INDEPENDENT WRITING TEST
SHOULD COLLEGE BE FREE FOR EVERYONE?
Governments all around the world have many different perspectives when facing up their education policies. While some governments see many benefits in having a free-collages-policy, others prefer this to be a commodity paid by private means. It is of my thinking that colleges should be free for citizens due to economic and social reasons.
On the one hand, a state with a free education policy enables not only the individual self-realization but also the whole collective of citizens. Having open universities to the public, no matter their economic status is an investment. Universities will produce many professionals in a wide range of areas, that can help in the development of the country. For instance, having doctors and scientists is a national advantage not only to discover illnesses cures but also to cure them. Entrepreneurs opening their own companies will help to drive a country´s economy. Additionally, having a well-educated population allows individuals to ascend in the social scale.
On the other hand, it has been proved by many studies that having people in colleges keeps them out from committing crimes. As a result, when a community has full access to education, it gets them away from criminal matters such as drugs and robberies. Moreover, a recent research made by the Argentinian government has shown that the rates of insecurity have declined after the launch of free educational programs in disadvantaged neighborhoods.
For all the reasons above, I am definitely convinced that free education policies, from elementary to college, should be adopted by all the countries and seen this as a great investment that it is.
Glamour English says
Thank you a million! Great job!